Alleged Stickam rapist John Hock indicted

Wow girl you are serious stupid. Just by seeing your comment before. I guess degrading yourself is cool in your eyes. Because supporting rapest is just wonderful! Hopefully you never experience rape or any other form of sexual abuse but by the looks of how your going it might just happen. And girly just because you talked to him on stickam and watched him doesn't mean you know him. I doubt he even remembers who you're. Stop supporting a sicko I doubt you would be supporting him if he wasnt hot, online "famous", and whatever else you want to say.

I guess its true about John liking ugly girls because you look stupid gross. You made me barf in my mouth I advise you not to leave your link in your name anymore.

Just because your fat and ugly doesnt mean you have to demean yourself for low lives like these.

Good luck and I hope you realize you shouldn't be supporting this man. By the way I'm 15 and only hating on him because he deserves to be.

I hope he has fun being raped in prison. He's going to be the bitch now. I wonder how he'll like it. Wait by the looks of him he will because of him in jeffree star having sex ect.

Wait till a big guy in prison squashes his skinny ass after they get him in the ass. His name won't be John Hock anymore it will be Shaniqua or whatever the inmates want to call him that night.

haha wow. actually i do know john. im not just one of his little fan girls that watched him on stickam. i know the girl in this case too, i wont say her name because i know she doesn't want it out.

by commenting on my looks all you are doing is making yourself seem even less mature

What kind of time do you think he will get?

He looks like that guy from that P2 movie Heheheheheh

Hmm, He kidnapped her yet they were in her bedroom? Perhaps, she was partying with him and passed out, not much kidnapping involved in that and I can't think of a better person to pass out next to. Haha. He set up the computer and web cam and he took pictures and a video. Hmm her bedroom and she provided him with the tools to take pictures and a video. Does passing out around a guy give him the right to rape you? Nah but it does make her stupid, unless like myself she wanted to pass out next to him! Lol. If he really did it, and I strongly use the word if, I don't feel he should be made an example of. He's still young and making mistakes that people make and later learn from. Slap him on the wrist and send my baby home. Lol. Yes, I'm supporting John Hock, not rape.

Haha at my sounding like John Hock in the making. I honestly just put all of that to get your pantys in a bunch and apparently it worked! Although there was a little bit of truth to it, such as the woman was STUPID! I'm sure she knew his reputation and being a woman she SHOULD know you don't get drunk and pass out with a male. I personally don't think he should be made an example out of. Fuck he's 21 and has his whole life ahead of him. He deserves at most a little jail time and probation. To give him decades in prison would just be wrong, considering murders get out in less time. I feel she's partially responsible for this happening even if it was due to stupidity. I also think a lot of girls are jumping on the bandwagon because of his efame.

Oh yeah and I'm in the process of ordering up some "Free John Hock" T-shirts would you like one? You better request them now they're going fast.
John Hock ftw.

Slap Chris's baby on the wrist and send him home, lmao!

How about the fact that Angel was implying that I supported John Hock because he was "Efamous" when I said, others have the right to do so if they please. That right there implies that she can't read or comprehend what she has read. To address the paragraph thing, well it's all the same subject so I felt no need to separate it into paragraphs.

Seriously I came to this website looking for an intelligent debate on the issue at hand which is John Hock. Let's get back to the real subject and leave behind the failed attempts at insults.
You'll notice my previous posts mainly consisted of talking about John Hock, after all isn't that what we should be discussing here?

Back on subject, enlighten me with your thoughts on the subject at hand…

Chuck, I wouldn't be surprised if he hit from both sides of the plate. Not thare's anything wrong with that.

As for his defenders, your what's wrong with society today. Nobody is actually held responsible for their actions.

I'm a little intoxicated, I'm going to reply to these posts when I'm sober, but don't trip the cams off at the moment, lmao.

John Hock ftw. Ahahahahahaha!

How is the following post by you Jae a paragraph? One sentence is not a fucking paragraph.

What about Angel’s post indicated that she couldn’t read?

Or maybe you’re not sure what reading is? Since you’re clearly not clever enough to separate your thoughts out with paragraphs. Think before you speak and maybe, look up “paragraph” in the dictionary before responding.

Okay. So who wants to start laying down bets that Chris and Diana are the same person?

Since you don't allows url's in posts, we will try it this way. Let's see if this will be my third comment deleted, I'm on a roll, lol.

Anyways feel free to look us up on Myspace, you will find her as my number one top friend.
Let the insults begin, lmao.

Doesn't matter how drunk she was, it still doesn't equal consent, not to mention that Jon-Boy has a history of sexual violence…the logic of his defenders is akin to saying that a murder victim "deserved it" because s/he was in the wrong place @ the wrong time.

And that other argument is laughable…yes, I'm sure the regs on here wish they were some small-time internet "superstar" who sleeps on friends' couches and fathers out-of-wedlock children that he denies are his…and I won't even dignify the "closet rapists" remark w/a comment.

I was pretty sure that he didn't have intercourse with her…so that rules out calling him a rapist.

I agree Mister Chuck, I never said in either scenario they deserved it to happen. I do believe it makes them stupid and partially responsible that it happened to begin with though. If they had not both made those choices, it never would of all happened. Thus making both responsible.

No one said that she would know, that if she got drunk, and passed out she would be SEXUALLY ASSAULTED on video but, she should know that she is at whoevers mercy that she is with, when she's passed out drunk. As for trusting him, it is my understanding they were dating for a few weeks. That is far to soon to be trusting someone. Once again stupidity.

Wow, I do think this guy deserves to be punished for what he did, he made a mistake, but something as harsh as spending the rest of his life in one of the toughest prisons in the country, that's completely ridiculous. Why is it that people that are indicted for raping children are usually given about 4 years and get out, when this guy's crime was nowhere near as bad and he's been given 3 felony charges? Read this statistic of the average sentence of sex offenders and child molesters in America: "The average sentence imposed on the 9,700 sex offenders was 8 years and, on average, 3 1/2 years of those 8 years were actually served prior to release. The average sentence imposed on the 4,300 child molesters was approximately 7 years and, on average, child molesters were released after serving 3 of the 7 years." – Bureau of Justice Statistics, http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/press/rsorp94pr….
Most CHILD MOLESTERS get out after 3 years! I see none of you starting an outrage against the people who are out there fucking up the lives of innocent children, yet its such a huge fucking deal that this guy played with his ditsy passed-out drunk girlfriend's vaj on stickam as a damn joke. Not only that, but he was drunk too. How many of you have made bad decisions when you were shit faced? I really don't think he deserves life in prison, but I'm only using logic in my thinking, I think everyone else posting here really doesn't care that this guy recieves justice the fair way that everyone else in this country deserves it, I believe you all just want to see this guy strapped to an electric chair while every sick child raping fuck out there walks the streets eager to rape again. Ask yourself, do you really think that John Hock would fuck up like this again, knowing how bad his life is screwed because of this stupid prank? then ask yourself if you'd feel safe leaving your kid around someone who has a serious obsession with a child's body, who got out after serving just 3 years in prison. I don't think John Hock is innocent by any means, but I will stand by what's right and say that he deserves the same justice everyone else should get.

You know I'm glad you're not being sarcastic because damn straight, I'm proud of my daughter. Not because of Myspace, pictures, internet bs, or friend count but because I know her. She is a beautiful person! Never once has she gotten any sort of trouble, not to mention she excelled in school. As for the drinking underage, indeed she knows it's wrong. However she didn't get drunk and pass out with a strange male because she's intelligent as well.

Wow, I do think this guy deserves to be punished for what he did, he made a mistake, but something as harsh as spending the rest of his life in one of the toughest prisons in the country, that’s completely ridiculous. Why is it that people that are indicted for raping children are usually given about 4 years and get out, when this guy’s crime was nowhere near as bad and he’s been given 3 felony charges? Read this statistic of the average sentence of sex offenders and child molesters in America: “The average sentence imposed on the 9,700 sex offenders was 8 years and, on average, 3 1/2 years of those 8 years were actually served prior to release. The average sentence imposed on the 4,300 child molesters was approximately 7 years and, on average, child molesters were released after serving 3 of the 7 years.” – Bureau of Justice Statistics, hxxp://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/press/rsorp94pr.htm
Most CHILD MOLESTERS get out after 3 years! I see none of you starting an outrage against the people who are out there fucking up the lives of innocent children, yet its such a huge fucking deal that this guy played with his ditsy passed-out drunk girlfriend’s vaj on stickam as a damn joke. Not only that, but he was drunk too. How many of you have made bad decisions when you were shit faced? I really don’t think he deserves life in prison, but I’m only using logic in my thinking, I think everyone else posting here really doesn’t care that this guy recieves justice the fair way that everyone else in this country deserves it, I believe you all just want to see this guy strapped to an electric chair while every sick child raping fuck out there walks the streets eager to rape again. Ask yourself, do you really think that John Hock would fuck up like this again, knowing how bad his life is screwed because of this stupid prank? then ask yourself if you’d feel safe leaving your kid around someone who has a serious obsession with a child’s body, who got out after serving just 3 years in prison. I don’t think John Hock is innocent by any means, but I will stand by what’s right and say that he deserves the same justice everyone else should get.

Yup it is "some" Myspace, lmao.
Nope you're not supposed to have heard of me
It's "official" because I have fakes out there. Duh. I think you need a reminder I'm not the one who is being put on trial here You can argue the victim isn't either but she still played a part in it, I however did not. You should really stop judging people by their Myspaces or looks.

Yes my mother and the rest of my family are all very proud of me. Risque photos have nothing to do with it.

Underage drinking huh? Wow, I can't believe you would even bring that one up considering you're defending an underage drinker. Yes I am underage, yes I drank the other night, what does that mean? It means I'm a teenager, lmao.
Like you can HONESTLY say you never drank while underage. Since you want to comment it I'll go ahead and tell you that would be the second time I have drank in two years.

My clique? Lmao. The only aspect you could consider us "trashing" the victim would be the part where I said what she did wasn't very smart, I stand by that. I drank but did I end up passed out with some guy I've only known a few weeks? Nope, because I'm smarter then that.

Seriously would it make a difference if I was related to him or not? Would that make him anymore guilty? Even if I was related that would be irrelevant, as for being jealous, probably if I was jealous, I'd be against him and be pissed off like all other girls/guys ganging up on him. The smarter conclusion would have been for you to think that I just support my local yokels. I can support him and not have an ulterior motive. I can think it's being blown way out of proportion without being one of his psychotic fans.

I'm not going to debate that what he didn't wasn't wrong, it was. But I do think it's being made a lot bigger deal of then what it should be. I believe the punishment should fit the crime and the crime wasn't as bad as it's being made out to be, especially with this story making it nationwide, murders don't even make it nationwide.

I noticed you started your article out with "emo douche bag" is that his crime? Is he being put on trial for the way he looks? Why is it you even wrote that, was it relating to his looks or his emotional state of being?
What type of sentence do you think he should get? Let's here your stance on the matter.

And by the way, I welcome all the hatred you can aim at my name.

Yeah, a search of the archives should fill Sedwick in as to how we feel about child molesters…and I'd like to know exactly where any of the regs said they'd like to see Hock get a date w/Old Sparky…no one here ever said he deserves the death penalty for what he did, and such a sentence would be excessive, to say the least.

Kris, my question to them, why are they equally disgusted with John Hock and a child molester? Our children are not at risk with John walking the streets.

While I'm on the subject of "children", a total bullshit law would be the minor thing. A person at age 16 or higher should legally be able to have consensual sex with who they please.
In some states that's even the law it should be in every state.

Oh and since a previous post was deleted I'll say this again, usually a guilty person screams the loudest when someone else is in trouble for the same thing.

Oh yeah, and nobody here specifically said anyone wanted John put to death however with the way people are carrying on it seems that way. Most people on here sound like they will not rest until john's head is on a stick.

I can see where you're trying to make a connection but it's still a huge stretch, you're going from an inebriated 20 year old woman (who chose to date him and put herself in the position) he took advantage of to children.

The bottom line for me is that he took advantage of someone that at that point (for whatever reason) was unable to defend herself.

And people who do things like that? Are scum.

And I'd like to see more of a jail sentence for him AND pedophiles. But it's not likely to happen what with jails being overcrowded and such.

I'll let my mom know of your post when she gets home. Yes you are correct she is my mother, does that have relevance? Just wondering.

Anyways to address your question. Yes if I got drunk and went out and got into trouble, I should for sure get into trouble for my underage drinking, however, I didn't do that. Hmm.

What do you mean "reportedly" why don't you check out my profile for yourself, nowhere on it does it say I drink. IN FACT it says I no longer party. I have drank twice in the last 2 years, you would know that had you read earlier posts.
Once again I'm not the one on trial here.

If I had drank and got into trouble then yes I should be held responsible for my actions. And yes I know underage drinking is against the law, that's kind of why I refrain from doing it often, but you can't sit here and act high and mighty like you or anyone else has never drank while underage. I'm not being confrontational either just simply replying to your post.

Oh and back on the minors subject fuck kids used to get married and have children by age 13.

Jae, I have posted once that the woman in this case should be in trouble for breaking the law and indeed, she should be. She's no better then the average bear.

Indeed the law applies to my children as well. It doesn't matter who it is or what the situation is. If they break the law they should be treated as anyone else would be and I'm sure if my daughter got caught by mister police officer for underage drinking, she would be in trouble for it!

There's nothing about drinking on her Myspace, I live with Miss official Diana so I pretty much know her habits. Hehe.

One other off topic thing, I was born and in raised AZ and I have never been in trouble but I can't stand Sheriff Joe Arpaio, he's a pig. He makes prisoners live in tents, some have died from the AZ heat, feeds them ostrich burgers and he makes them wear pink boxers, to make the inmates will feel humiliated,<fail. (Real Men Wear Pink!) No I'm not saying it takes a prisoner to be a real man, just that it takes a real man to pull off wearing pink.

Yeah, 13 is way to young in my opinion. Once upon a time, girls got married at 13+ but in my opinion that should of never happened at such a young age. However if at such an age it was consensual and they were around the same age, I see nothing criminal about it. Makes me wonder though how a parent could even want to part with their child at such a young age.

Voice has a point in his saying that as a teen, if they want to have sex bad enough they will do it anyways but in my own experience of raising kids that rebellious attitude comes at a much later age. Well I guess if there's a lack of parenting all the childs life, that age could be much younger.

I do know 2 couples though who have been together since they were 13-14 and they are now in their 50's but I would NEVER want to see the age dropped to 13. They should still be playing in the dirt at that age. Dirt meaning sand, not dirt meaning smut.

it should be 16+. I personally was 17 almost 18 and yeah the guy was 21 and to this day, I say that should not be a crime. He may be an ex now, I may not even like him but let's get real here.

Not a problem Jae, I believe the post was referring to my daughter's myspace reguarding her pictures, since he said her mom must be proud of her pictures, and truthfully I am. I see nothing wrong with a 19 young woman, taking a picture in a bikini, nothing wrong with her picture where she has an alcohol beverage photo prop either. It's Hawaiian Punch hehe. Since the words attention whore was used, perhaps he meant her extended friend count as well, in all honesty that's her business, It's certainly not a crime. She doesn't meet people off the net and if she ever decides to, she knows the importance of knowing someone before trusting someone.

Oh and we are all so far off topic Lol.

If it had been Diana who was treated that way, would that change your opinion any? Just wondering. If Diana was dating some guy for a couple of weeks, and got drunk, and the guy did this to her – on camera, no less – would you not be angry? Would you not want to see him punished? Stupidity of the girl aside, it was a reprehensible thing for him to do.

My Response to Angel:
The only difference is, if this was my Diana, it would be more personal to me. As in I would personally feel more hurt, angry she's my daughter so that stands to reason but no his crime is still the same and if Diana had chosen to get drunk and pass out with a young man, knowing his reputation, indeed she would of done a STUPID thing. She would partially be responsible for it's happening. Responsible as in, it wouldn't of happened had she used more common sense and better judgment.

Fair enough, Chris. You are obviously a much more reasonable person than I am, because if something like that happened to one of my girls, I would be livid. I don't care if a girl runs naked down the street with a rubber glove on her head, yelling "I'm a chicken!", that still doesn't give anyone the right to violate her body. At the point the girl says "No", the man, if he continues, is committing rape. If the girl is unable to consent (passed out), it is automatically rape. It is in no way her fault that some walking penis decided to have sex with her. She is not responsible in any way for the bad decision made by the male, ESPECIALLY if she is passed out. It was his decision, not hers. And if the rape took place in her own bedroom, she had EVERY RIGHT to sleep there, drunk or sober, and feel secure in doing so. He was the one who had no rights.

As I said though, we will simply have to agree to disagree on this topic. I believe he should be sentenced just as harshly as any other rapist. He is, after all is said and done, a rapist.

I can be just as unreasonable as the next person, however we were discussing in this scenario, I feel the woman made horrible choices and as a direct result in her choices, she was sexually assaulted.

Example: My daughter dates a guy, they have consensual sex, they break up, he posts the video, do I want him punished for this? Not unless I'm just out to get him. It happened as a result of her choices. I realize I'm using a consensual example compared to assault but the posting of the video is apparently a felonie charge too. No he didn't have the right to do it but, I don't feel he deserves jail time and a record for it.

Example 2: My daughters husband comes home and beats the hell out of her and rapes her or their child, he would probably never see the inside of a jail cell because I'm sure something would happen to him along the way.

Neither of those examples apply here but it was fun. Lol. Theres a huge difference between those examples but I feel there's a huge difference between John Hock compared to a child molester and compared to a rapist. and again no one said it gave the man a right to do anything. I do however feel in this case it was all a direct result in this womans poor choices and unfortunately she's suffering the consequences of those poor choices.

no one here ever said he deserves the death penalty for what he did, and such a sentence would be excessive, to say the least.

Funny but excessive.

Oh and back on the minors subject fuck kids used to get married and have children by age 13.

They also used to work the coal mines.

Well being as I happen to know VOR, I know, he does not sound like and more importantly, he is not a child molester, as for his response to Diana, people can have different thoughts or opinions without having ulterior motives. You will find that people who are younger and don't have kids, have different responses, then people who do have.

Well you sound like you love to throw out insults and accusations with people, who don't share your thoughts on John Hock. You don't even know that VOR isn't 13. Anyhow, it's you who is following molesters, rapists,sexual offenders and murders without contributing a damn thing, to solve anything or to help with anything. Sick.

Since you've dubbed Diana, Dirty Diana, for having different views, why is it you're called Trenchy? Are you know in your hood as Old man Trench Coat? Trenchy for short.

You're acting very cornered.

But I guess that's how people behave when someone points out that they're probably pretending to be at least three to four other people in order to hold up an argument.

Continue protesting.

You don't even know that VOR isn't 13.

If he is his parents should be ashamed of letting him defend a sexual predator like Hock.

Since you've dubbed Diana, Dirty Diana, for having different views, why is it you're called Trenchy? Are you know in your hood as Old man Trench Coat? Trenchy for short.

Dirty Diana is a song by Michael Jackson. I thought she'd like being named after a song written by another sexual predator.

Why should they be ashamed for LETTING him defend Hock? You do realize parents don't have to let children do things like that? I mean come on, all their friends have computers, not to mention in school, they end up in chat rooms and other places they shouldn't be.

Speaking of Micheal Jackson, where's your blog about him? There is a difference in those two, so just because Diana is defending (as you put it) Hock doesn't mean she would defend Micheal Jackson. Hock's girl, was a woman NOT a child, unlike Mister Jacksons.

It really doesn't matter where we are posting from.

Oh and here is my post about Michael Jackson.
http://www.parentsbehavingbadly.com/2009/06/25/tr…